Technical SEO

Make your website
easier to discover.

Understand the technical issues holding search back. Give your development and product teams a clear path from diagnosis to implementation.

Site architecture connects the homepage, sections and useful pages so search engines can discover and understand content.
A framework for the work.

Where I focus

A technical review with
the whole website in view.

The right scope depends on the site, the symptoms and what is about to change. These are the core areas I investigate.

Crawling & indexation

Understand what search engines can reach, which pages are indexed and how canonicals, robots rules and sitemaps interact.

Rendering & performance

Review JavaScript dependencies, rendered content and performance issues that affect important page templates.

Architecture & change

Assess internal linking, structured data and migration risks so the technical foundations support the content.

Inside the work

Follow a problem
through to validation.

A useful investigation follows the affected pages through discovery, crawling, rendering and indexing. It also asks whether the same issue affects a whole template.

  1. Reproduce the symptom

    Compare representative URLs with the pages that are working. Review the relevant crawl, indexing and rendered-page evidence before choosing a fix.

  2. Define the change

    Document the affected pattern, expected behavior and implementation owner. Check the dependencies with the people who manage the platform.

  3. Validate the release

    Recheck the changed URLs and representative templates after implementation. Record what passed, what still needs investigation and what requires time to observe.

Typical deliverables

Findings your team
can work with.

An audit needs to explain the issue and the action. Recommendations connect the evidence to impact, ownership and a way to validate the fix.

  • Evidence-backed technical findings and affected page examples
  • A roadmap with severity, dependencies and implementation priorities
  • Ticket-level recommendations and acceptance criteria
  • Migration planning or post-release QA where the scope requires it

Selected work · Healthcare

Nastent Japan

A search audit and recovery roadmap for a Japanese medical-device website, connecting technical health, content and market evidence.

Read the case study

A connected approach

Search does not sit in isolation.

Technical systems, content, markets and measurement affect one another. Where the evidence points to another area, the roadmap should connect them.

Explore all expertise

Before we begin

Questions about
technical SEO work.

The investigation and the implementation are connected. Agreeing the access and responsibilities makes the work more useful.

What access is useful for an audit?

Search Console, an overview of the CMS and hosting setup, recent release or migration notes, and a list of important templates are useful starting points. Analytics, crawl exports or logs may be relevant to a specific question. We agree the access needed for the scope; credentials do not belong in the contact form.

Does fixing a technical issue guarantee indexing?

No. Technical eligibility and indexing are different. Google states that meeting its minimum requirements does not guarantee indexing. The work identifies obstacles, checks implementation and observes what changes. Read Google’s technical requirements.

Can robots.txt remove a page from search?

Blocking crawling is different from preventing indexing. Google may still know a blocked URL exists. For pages that should remain outside search, the appropriate approach depends on whether they must stay publicly accessible. We review the requirement before recommending a control. Google explains this distinction.

A useful next step

Let’s find the technical constraint.

Share the website, what changed and where you are seeing problems.

Start a conversation